Review




Structured Review

Optum Inc ehr discrete data
Model validation and optimization flowchart from the original UNAFIED-10 model to the new UNAFIED-8 model. AF = atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter; BMI = body mass index; CDS = clinical decision support; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; <t>EHR</t> = <t>electronic</t> <t>health</t> <t>record;</t> HF = heart failure; INPC HIE = Indiana Network for Patient Care health information exchange; OSA = obstructive sleep apnea; POC = proof-of-concept; UNAFIED = undiagnosed atrial fibrillation prediction using electronic health data. ∗Refer to Grout et al. 20 † Patient subpopulations were based on sex, type of health insurance, race, and region.
Ehr Discrete Data, supplied by Optum Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ehr discrete data/product/Optum Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ehr discrete data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Validation, bias assessment, and optimization of the UNAFIED 2-year risk prediction model for undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using national electronic health data"

Article Title: Validation, bias assessment, and optimization of the UNAFIED 2-year risk prediction model for undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using national electronic health data

Journal: Heart Rhythm O2

doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.09.010

Model validation and optimization flowchart from the original UNAFIED-10 model to the new UNAFIED-8 model. AF = atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter; BMI = body mass index; CDS = clinical decision support; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; EHR = electronic health record; HF = heart failure; INPC HIE = Indiana Network for Patient Care health information exchange; OSA = obstructive sleep apnea; POC = proof-of-concept; UNAFIED = undiagnosed atrial fibrillation prediction using electronic health data. ∗Refer to Grout et al. 20 † Patient subpopulations were based on sex, type of health insurance, race, and region.
Figure Legend Snippet: Model validation and optimization flowchart from the original UNAFIED-10 model to the new UNAFIED-8 model. AF = atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter; BMI = body mass index; CDS = clinical decision support; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; EHR = electronic health record; HF = heart failure; INPC HIE = Indiana Network for Patient Care health information exchange; OSA = obstructive sleep apnea; POC = proof-of-concept; UNAFIED = undiagnosed atrial fibrillation prediction using electronic health data. ∗Refer to Grout et al. 20 † Patient subpopulations were based on sex, type of health insurance, race, and region.

Techniques Used: Biomarker Discovery

Performance of the different UNAFIED models
Figure Legend Snippet: Performance of the different UNAFIED models

Techniques Used: Biomarker Discovery



Similar Products

90
Optum Inc ehr discrete data
Model validation and optimization flowchart from the original UNAFIED-10 model to the new UNAFIED-8 model. AF = atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter; BMI = body mass index; CDS = clinical decision support; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; <t>EHR</t> = <t>electronic</t> <t>health</t> <t>record;</t> HF = heart failure; INPC HIE = Indiana Network for Patient Care health information exchange; OSA = obstructive sleep apnea; POC = proof-of-concept; UNAFIED = undiagnosed atrial fibrillation prediction using electronic health data. ∗Refer to Grout et al. 20 † Patient subpopulations were based on sex, type of health insurance, race, and region.
Ehr Discrete Data, supplied by Optum Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ehr discrete data/product/Optum Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ehr discrete data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Model validation and optimization flowchart from the original UNAFIED-10 model to the new UNAFIED-8 model. AF = atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter; BMI = body mass index; CDS = clinical decision support; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; EHR = electronic health record; HF = heart failure; INPC HIE = Indiana Network for Patient Care health information exchange; OSA = obstructive sleep apnea; POC = proof-of-concept; UNAFIED = undiagnosed atrial fibrillation prediction using electronic health data. ∗Refer to Grout et al. 20 † Patient subpopulations were based on sex, type of health insurance, race, and region.

Journal: Heart Rhythm O2

Article Title: Validation, bias assessment, and optimization of the UNAFIED 2-year risk prediction model for undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using national electronic health data

doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.09.010

Figure Lengend Snippet: Model validation and optimization flowchart from the original UNAFIED-10 model to the new UNAFIED-8 model. AF = atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter; BMI = body mass index; CDS = clinical decision support; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; EHR = electronic health record; HF = heart failure; INPC HIE = Indiana Network for Patient Care health information exchange; OSA = obstructive sleep apnea; POC = proof-of-concept; UNAFIED = undiagnosed atrial fibrillation prediction using electronic health data. ∗Refer to Grout et al. 20 † Patient subpopulations were based on sex, type of health insurance, race, and region.

Article Snippet: The C-statistic (95% CI) was similar (0.850 [0.845–0.857] vs 0.851 [0.849– 0.851]) ( ) between the complete and balanced validation cohorts from Optum EHR discrete data, which was not improved with NLP data enrichment (0.847 vs 0.842) (Online ).

Techniques: Biomarker Discovery

Performance of the different UNAFIED models

Journal: Heart Rhythm O2

Article Title: Validation, bias assessment, and optimization of the UNAFIED 2-year risk prediction model for undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using national electronic health data

doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.09.010

Figure Lengend Snippet: Performance of the different UNAFIED models

Article Snippet: The C-statistic (95% CI) was similar (0.850 [0.845–0.857] vs 0.851 [0.849– 0.851]) ( ) between the complete and balanced validation cohorts from Optum EHR discrete data, which was not improved with NLP data enrichment (0.847 vs 0.842) (Online ).

Techniques: Biomarker Discovery